A room full of tweets

I’ve been thinking about Twitter. Specifically, about the use of Twitter at conferences.  And then I read this post by Joseph Jaffe, in which he states his strong opinion that Twitter should be banned at conferences.  I couldn’t agree more. But I think he misses a few important points.

A little background.  I recently spoke at a conference where there was a lot of tweeting going on. This wasn’t surprising, as it was a social media-related conference.  To be fair, there were no horribly negative experiences, like this this one.  People were respectful, and were complimentary of my presentation in their tweets. But still, I came away with the very strong opinion that conference organizers should respectfully ask the attendees not to Twitter during presentations, and that the organizers should not facilitate the use of Twitter. I want to say emphatically that I am not criticizing the organizers of the conference I attended.  And I’m not even criticizing the conference attendees who were tweeting. Twitter is still relatively new, and everyone is still experimenting with what works. Further, conference organizers are under a lot of pressure to incorporate social media elements into conferences. I also have to confess that I sent a few tweets myself during the conference. Not a lot. But a few.

But having seen twitter in action (and having had the experience of presenting while people were tweeting), here’s my list of why Twitter should not be used during conferences:

1.  It’s rude.  When people go to the trouble to prepare a presentation for a conference, the audience should have the courtesy to pay attention. And when you have your head in your laptop or your Blackberry, you’re not paying attention. It’s really frustrating to look at your audience and see the tops of people’s heads.

2. It’s disrespectful. It’s too easy to be mean on Twitter.  To type something that crosses the line of funny into snarky. And makes the presenter look foolish. While she’s presenting. So as the presenter, you get paranoid wondering what people are tweeting about you.  And worst-case, if people are tweeting nasty things, the presenter can lose control of the audience. (See above example.)

3. It doesn’t add any value. I understand that the idea of the “backchannel” created by Twitter is to allow people who aren’t in attendance to share in the learnings of the conference, and for conference attendees to build on the ideas presented at the conference. But at the conference I attended, the overwhelming majority of tweets were one-line quotes that the presenter said.  And without the context of the rest of the presentation, I don’t see how that’s going to be of any value to anyone not in the room.  And even if there are nuggets of information, how many people are actually going to wade through hundreds or thousands of tweets to get them? And as for the people in the room, they’re hearing it live, so why would they want to read it again on Twitter?

4. It’s a circle-jerk. (Pardon the expression.) So think about it.  You have people sitting in a presentation tweeting. And the majority of the people who are reading the twitter feed are other people who are sitting in the same room. If anyone outside the room was really that interested, they’d be attending the conference, instead of trying to get snippets of information from the Twitter feed.   So the group is in effect tweeting crap to itself. What is the point of that? Why doesn’t everyone just pay attention instead?

5. It will make conferences less valuable in the long run. Because people who have valuable things to say will stop presenting at conferences because it won’t be worth the risk of humiliation.

And those are my 5 reasons to stop the use of Twitter at conferences.

Advertisements

3 Comments

Filed under Social Media Observations

3 responses to “A room full of tweets

  1. Scott

    Is it “circle-jerk,” “circle jerk” or “circlejerk”? Urban Dictionary has entries for all three. Judging by the entry dates and number of thumbs up/down (of course such a literal event is more thumbs sideways, but I digress) the preference is for “circle jerk” then “circlejerk.” I also note that, somewhat surprisingly, Dictionary.com has an entry for “circle jerk” but defines it only in its literal, not figurative, sense. The Dictionary of Modern Legal Usage, which cries out for an entry, is no help.

  2. Pegeen

    I’m convinced.

  3. wonderful treatment of the subject deb. some personal thoughts…..

    i’ve been presenting at tech conferences since the late 80s and in the last 15 years i’ve noticed more and more multitasking going on at events that is often disruptive.

    most of the time when i present, i’m doing 4 or 8 hour tutorials as opposed to presenting papers. most of the time folks are fairly engaged and respectful during a session. but there are the odd folks that are surfing via laptops or perusing data on their crackheld devices.

    the email/instant gratification behaviors have been around for some time. thank goodness at most tech conferences, people are there to learn and have paid a lot of coin to attend a tutorial. they’re hungry for some take-aways from the session, since they’re usually under the gun back at the office to come up with some whiz bang solution/silver bullet to address subjects like world peace or software estimation.

    in cases where i have disconnected attendees, i have methods that i employ to engage them. i usually roam the floor until i’m in their general area and call on them to offer an opinion on something that i’m presenting. ofttimes it works and they put their little thingy away and join the rest of us.

    but this twit culture of twits…..goodness gracious sakes alive….i can say that if i found someone tweeting during my presentation, i would ask them to stow their device, as i find it distracting and other attendees might be distracted by twit actions.

    as i think to 2010 and my next tute gig, i’m tempted to open my presentation with the caveat of a twit free zone. all twits will become nits, and all tweetfreaks will be outed during the session.

    another alternative is to pack it in as a presenter and join the twitter wolfpack revolution.

    maybe it’s time to go rediscover my programming roots and develop a killer app that kills tweets within a certain set of coordinates…..

    that’s the ticket….

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s